A · current touch
The untouched complete solo from the longer-sentences take.
Same line.
A wider touch.
The same 93 notes, six phrases, timing, gates and original guitar. This tests a wider version of the existing touch plan: softer soft notes and stronger destinations, not another melody or instrument. Both complete solos have matched guitar playback loudness.
B · wider touch
Only the existing written touch expands. No new accents reset at barlines and no random timing.
More contrast is not automatically more musical. This is an unapproved performance choice, not a claim of soul, human playing or Pat-level phrasing. The original Ruth and the previous writing take stay untouched.
Complete wider-touch take · MP3 · WAV · Previous complete take · Preserved original Ruth
What reaches the sound
The original excitation formula turns the preceding 0.37–0.68 written velocities into about 3.24 dB of same-pitch amplitude contrast. The alternative expands that existing plan around 0.52 without clipping, giving about 7.60 dB in fixed-pitch probes. These are not whole-track dynamic-range values or a musical-quality score.
The original model, excitation formula, release, highpass, pan and source gain do not change. An independent complete-waveform check reproduces A's raw sound exactly and predicts B only by the new per-note touch amplitudes. Natural pitch-dependent body response stays intact, rather than flattening every note to the same loudness.
One constant matches only the new complete solo's playback level. The full take keeps exact accepted theme/ring-out/closing PCM and original mix-minus-guitar backing. Every old recording, source and URL remains preserved.
Comparison and preservation measurements · Measured original touch response · Independent complete-waveform check · Exact score delta · Unchanged original guitar source